Natural Product: NPC476866

Natural Product IDNPC476866
Common Name
?
The InCHIKey will be temporarily assigned as the "Common Name" if no IUPAC name or alternative short name is available.
[(2R,3S,4S,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-[2-hydroxy-4-[(E)-3-oxo-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyprop-1-enyl]phenoxy]oxan-2-yl]methyl (E)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate
IUPAC Name [(2R,3S,4S,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-[2-hydroxy-4-[(E)-3-oxo-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyprop-1-enyl]phenoxy]oxan-2-yl]methyl (E)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate
Synonyms
Synthetic Gene Cluster n.a.
ChEMBL Identifier n.a.
PubChem CID 122181705
Chemical Classification
  • CHEMONTID:0000000 [Organic compounds]
    • [CHEMONTID:0000261] Phenylpropanoids and polyketides
      • [CHEMONTID:0000476] Cinnamic acids and derivatives
        • [CHEMONTID:0001391] Hydroxycinnamic acids and derivatives
          • [CHEMONTID:0003002] Hydroxycinnamic acid esters
            • [CHEMONTID:0003003] Hydroxycinnamic acid glycosides

The Chemical Classification was calculated by Classyfire, a software for chemical taxonomy calculation. Reference: DOI:10.1186/s13321-016-0174-y.

  Chemical Representations

Standard InCHIKey NJZKNNCKRZJHCK-OGGREQCXSA-N
Standard InCHI InChI=1S/C30H34O16/c31-12-19-23(36)25(38)28(41)30(44-19)46-22(35)10-5-15-3-8-18(17(33)11-15)43-29-27(40)26(39)24(37)20(45-29)13-42-21(34)9-4-14-1-6-16(32)7-2-14/h1-11,19-20,23-33,36-41H,12-13H2/b9-4+,10-5+/t19-,20-,23-,24-,25+,26+,27-,28-,29-,30+/m1/s1
SMILES C1=CC(=CC=C1/C=C/C(=O)OC[C@@H]2[C@H]([C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H](O2)OC3=C(C=C(C=C3)/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H]4[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O4)CO)O)O)O)O)O)O)O)O

  Calculated Properties

Physi-Chem Properties

Molecular Weight:   650.18 Volume:   607.489
?
Van der Waals volume.
Dense:   1.07 LogP:   0.551
?
The logarithm of the n-octanol/water distribution coefficients.
logD7.4:   1.028
?
The logarithm of the n-octanol/water distribution coefficient at pH=7.4.
LogS:   -2.714
?
The logarithm of aqueous solubility value.
Rotatable Bonds:   12.0 Rigid Bonds:   28.0
TPSA:   262.36
?
Topological Polar Surface Area.
H-Bond Acceptor:   16.0
H-Bond Donor:   9.0 Rings:   4.0
Heavy Atoms:   16.0

MedChem Properties

QED Drug-Likeness Score:   0.098 GASA:   0.0
?
GASA represents the probability of being difficult to synthesize, ranging from 0 to 1.
Synthetic Accessibility Score:   4.717 Fsp3:   0.4
MCE-18:   100.81
?
MCE-18 stands for medicinal chemistry evolution.MCE-18≥45 is considered a suitable value.
Lipinski Rule-of-5:   Accepted
Pfizer Rule:   Rejected GSK Rule:   Accepted
Golden Triangle Rule:   Accepted BMS Rule:   1
Chelating Alert:   1 PAINS Alert:   0
Colloidal aggregators:   0.734 Fluc inhibitor:   0.807
?
The fluc inhibitor value is the probability of being fLuc inhibitors, within the range of 0 to 1.
Blue fluorescence:   0.198
?
The blue fluorescence value is the probability of being blue fluorescence, within the range of 0 to 1
Green fluorescence:   0.646
?
The green fluorescence value is the probability of being green fluorescence, within the range of 0 to 1
Reactive compounds:   0.423 Promiscuous compounds:   0.382

ADMET Properties (ADMETlab3.0)

ADMET: Absorption

Caco-2 Permeability:   -6.472 MDCK Permeability:   -5.158
Pgp-inhibitor:   0.0 Pgp-substrate:   0.054
PAMPA:   0.999
?
The experimental data for Peff was logarithmically transformed (logPeff). Molecules with log Peff values below 2.0 were classified as low-permeability (Category 0), while those with log Peff values exceeding 2.5 were classified as high-permeability (Category 1).
Human Intestinal Absorption (HIA):   0.961
20% Bioavailability (F20%):   0.996 30% Bioavailability (F30%):   1.0
50% Bioavailability (F50%):   1.0

ADMET: Distribution

Blood-Brain-Barrier Penetration (BBB):   0.0 MRP1:   0.0
Plasma Protein Binding (PPB):   77.624% Volume Distribution (VD):   -0.195
Fu: 21.019%
?
The fraction unbound in plasms.
OATP1B1 inhibitor:   1.0
OATP1B3 inhibitor:   1.0 BCRP inhibitor:   0.001
BSEP inhibitor:   0.032

ADMET: Metabolism

CYP1A2-inhibitor:   0.0 CYP1A2-substrate:   0.0
CYP2C19-inhibitor:   0.0 CYP2C19-substrate:   0.0
CYP2C9-inhibitor:   0.0 CYP2C9-substrate:   0.0
CYP2D6-inhibitor:   0.0 CYP2D6-substrate:   0.0
CYP3A4-inhibitor:   0.0 CYP3A4-substrate:   0.999
CYP2B6-substrate:   0.0 CYP2C8-inhibitor:   1.0
HLM stability:   0.016
?
Human liver microsomal (HLM) stability. Category 0: stable+ (HLM > 30 min); Category 1: unstable- (HLM ≤ 30 min). The output value is the probability of human liver microsomal instability, where a value closer to 1 indicates a higher likelihood of instability.

ADMET: Excretion

Clearance (CL):  1.164 Half-life (T1/2):  4.066

ADMET: Toxicity

hERG Blockers:  0.013 hERG Blockers (10um):  0.126
Human Hepatotoxicity (H-HT):  0.597 Drug-induced Liver Injury (DILI):  0.966
AMES Toxicity:  0.97 Rat Oral Acute Toxicity:  0.003
Maximum Recommended Daily Dose:  0.034 Skin Sensitization:  1.0
Carcinogencity:  0.047 Eye Corrosion:  0.0
Eye Irritation:  0.024 Respiratory Toxicity:  0.0
Drug-induced Neurotoxicity:  0.006 Ototoxicity:  0.958
Hematotoxicity:  0.055 Drug-induced Nephrotoxicity:  0.976
Genotoxicity:  0.656 RPMI-8226 Immunitoxicity:  0.239
A549 Cytotoxicity:  0.413 Hek293 Cytotoxicity:  0.396
BCF:   0.588
?
Bioconcentration factors are used for considering secondary poisoning potential and assessing risks to human health via the food chain. The unit is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)].
IGC50:   3.327
?
48 hour Tetrahymena pyriformis IGC50. The unit of IGC50 is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)].
LC50DM:   5.047
?
48 hour Daphnia magna LC50. The unit of LC50DM is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)].
LC50FM:   4.387
?
96 hour fathead minnow LC50. The unit of LC50FM is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)].

  Species Source

Organism ID Organism Name Taxonomy Level Family SuperKingdom Isolation Part Collection Location Collection Time Reference
NPO33548 Clematis tashiroi Species Ranunculaceae Eukaryota aerial parts Heping District, Taichung City, Taiwan 2012-AUG PMID[26143931]

Note for Reference:
In addition to directly collecting NP source organism data from primary literature (where reference will provided as NCBI PMID or DOI links), NPASS also integrated them from below databases:
UNPD: Universal Natural Products Database [PMID: 23638153].
StreptomeDB: a database of streptomycetes natural products [PMID: 33051671].
TM-MC: a database of medicinal materials and chemical compounds in Northeast Asian traditional medicine [PMID: 26156871].
TCM@Taiwan: a Traditional Chinese Medicine database [PMID: 21253603].
TCMID: a Traditional Chinese Medicine database [PMID: 29106634].
TCMSP: The traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology database and analysis platform [PMID: 24735618].
HerDing: a herb recommendation system to treat diseases using genes and chemicals [PMID: 26980517].
MetaboLights: a metabolomics database [PMID: 27010336].
FooDB: a database of constituents, chemistry and biology of food species [www.foodb.ca].



  NP Quantity Composition/Concentration

Organism ID Organism Name Organism Material Preparation Organism Part NP Quantity (Standard) NP Quantity (Minimum) NP Quantity (Maximum) Quantity Unit Reference

Note for Reference:
In addition to directly collecting NP quantitative data from primary literature (where reference will provided as NCBI PMID or DOI links), NPASS also integrated NP quantitative records for specific NP domains (e.g., NPS from foods or herbs) from domain-specific databases. These databases include:
DUKE: Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases.
PHENOL EXPLORER: is the first comprehensive database on polyphenol content in foods [PMID: 24103452], its homepage can be accessed at here.
FooDB: a database of constituents, chemistry and biology of food species [www.foodb.ca].



 Biological Activity

Molecular-level activity

Target ID Target Type Target Name Target Organism Activity Type Activity Relation Value Unit Reference

In vitro activity

Target ID Target Type Target Name Target Organism Activity Type Activity Relation Value Unit Reference
NPT1 Others Radical scavenging activity n.a. Activity = 7.8 % PMID[26143931]

In vivo activity

Target ID Target Type Target Name Target Organism Activity Type Activity Relation Value Unit Reference





 Experimental ADME

Experiment Model Experiment Tissue ADME Type ADME Relation ADME Value ADME Unit Reference





 Experimental Toxicity

Quantitative toxicity

Experiment Model Experiment Organism Toxicity Type Toxicity Relation Toxicity Value Toxicity Unit Reference

Common Abbreviations:
LC: Lethal Concentration; LD: Lethal Dose; LT:Lethal Time; NOAEL: No-observed-adverse-effect Level; BMDL: Benchmark Dose Lower Confidence Limit; BMD: Benchmark Dose; BMC:Benchmark Concentration; LOAEL: Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level; RfD:Reference Dose; RfC:Reference Concentration; MRL: Minimal Risk Level; MEG: Maximum Exposure Guideline; PAC: Protective Action Criteria

Categorical toxicity labels

Hepatotoxicity Carcinogenicity Mutagenicity Cardiotoxicity Respiratory Toxicity Eye Irritation Endocrine Disruption
Hepatotoxicity Carcinogenicity Mutagenicity Cardiotoxicity Respiratory Toxicity Eye Irritation Endocrine Disruption

Note for Reference:
In addition to directly collecting NP quantitative data from primary literature (where reference will provided as NCBI PMID or DOI links), NPASS also integrated NP toxicity records from domain-specific databases. These databases include:
ToxValDB: a curated database that compiles quantitative toxicity values for chemicals from diverse public sources to support toxicological research and risk assessment.
TOXRIC: a comprehensive, free-to-access, online database providing toxicological/feature data. The toxicity labels are retrieved from this database. [PMID: 36400569]


  Chemically structural similarity

Similar Active Natural Products in NPASS

Top-200 similar NPs were calculated against the active-NP-set (includes approximately 50,000 NPs with experimentally-derived bioactivity available in NPASS)

Similarity is measured using the Tanimoto coefficient (Tc) , which compares the binary fingerprints of two molecules. Tc is calculated as the intersection divided by the union of '1' bits in the fingerprints, ranging from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating highest similarity.

●  The left chart: Distribution of similarity level between NPC476866 and all remaining natural products in the NPASS database.
●  The right table: Most similar natural products (Tc>=0.5 or Top200).

Similarity Score Similarity Level Natural Product ID
0.9028 High Similarity NPC476864
0.8553 High Similarity NPC476865
0.84 Intermediate Similarity NPC476869
0.8133 Intermediate Similarity NPC476867
0.7821 Intermediate Similarity NPC476868
0.7571 Intermediate Similarity NPC202700
0.6575 Remote Similarity NPC100389
0.6538 Remote Similarity NPC291153
0.6522 Remote Similarity NPC11724
0.631 Remote Similarity NPC204937
0.6071 Remote Similarity NPC291296
0.6071 Remote Similarity NPC10205
0.6049 Remote Similarity NPC157898
0.6044 Remote Similarity NPC476871
0.6027 Remote Similarity NPC481303
0.5972 Remote Similarity NPC232880
0.5952 Remote Similarity NPC225307
0.5934 Remote Similarity NPC133984
0.593 Remote Similarity NPC157816
0.5921 Remote Similarity NPC52097
0.5921 Remote Similarity NPC157554
0.5814 Remote Similarity NPC28637
0.5806 Remote Similarity NPC3460
0.575 Remote Similarity NPC479473
0.575 Remote Similarity NPC275721
0.575 Remote Similarity NPC288416
0.575 Remote Similarity NPC479468
0.575 Remote Similarity NPC479474
0.5714 Remote Similarity NPC488081
0.5663 Remote Similarity NPC34293
0.5652 Remote Similarity NPC300262
0.5647 Remote Similarity NPC168358
0.5625 Remote Similarity NPC470572
0.5618 Remote Similarity NPC488082
0.5612 Remote Similarity NPC484979
0.5604 Remote Similarity NPC472876
0.5532 Remote Similarity NPC125823
0.5532 Remote Similarity NPC7145
0.5532 Remote Similarity NPC143480
0.5529 Remote Similarity NPC219677
0.5529 Remote Similarity NPC145319
0.5506 Remote Similarity NPC226005
0.5495 Remote Similarity NPC262182
0.5488 Remote Similarity NPC229784
0.5488 Remote Similarity NPC477293
0.5481 Remote Similarity NPC484988
0.5455 Remote Similarity NPC471405
0.5435 Remote Similarity NPC83743
0.5385 Remote Similarity NPC59324
0.5385 Remote Similarity NPC476870
0.5375 Remote Similarity NPC186418
0.5361 Remote Similarity NPC201148
0.5349 Remote Similarity NPC252114
0.5349 Remote Similarity NPC166180
0.5347 Remote Similarity NPC599948
0.5325 Remote Similarity NPC57751
0.5278 Remote Similarity NPC484983
0.5275 Remote Similarity NPC254819
0.5263 Remote Similarity NPC604356
0.5253 Remote Similarity NPC80068
0.5238 Remote Similarity NPC473924
0.5238 Remote Similarity NPC186406
0.5238 Remote Similarity NPC287597
0.5204 Remote Similarity NPC476620
0.5195 Remote Similarity NPC476872
0.5176 Remote Similarity NPC199977
0.5169 Remote Similarity NPC281798
0.5152 Remote Similarity NPC270675
0.5152 Remote Similarity NPC195685
0.5119 Remote Similarity NPC477294
0.5109 Remote Similarity NPC205195
0.5106 Remote Similarity NPC479767
0.51 Remote Similarity NPC28651
0.51 Remote Similarity NPC85751
0.51 Remote Similarity NPC19240
0.51 Remote Similarity NPC477629
0.5098 Remote Similarity NPC603856
0.5091 Remote Similarity NPC484981
0.5067 Remote Similarity NPC313193
0.505 Remote Similarity NPC36138

Similar Clinical/Approved Drugs

Similarity level is defined by Tanimoto coefficient (Tc) between two molecules.

●  The left chart: Distribution of similarity level between NPC476866 and all drugs/candidates.
●  The right table: Most similar clinical/approved drugs (Tc>=0.5 or Top200).

Similarity Score Similarity Level Drug ID Developmental Stage
NPD

Bioactivity similarity

  Bioactivity similarity

Similar Natural Products in NPASS

Similarity level is defined by Bioactivity similarity was calculated based on bioactivity descriptors of compounds. The bioactivity descriptors were calculated by a recently developed AI algorithm Chemical Checker (CC) [Nature Biotechnology, 38:1087–1096, 2020; Nature Communications, 12:3932, 2021], which evaluated bioactivity similarities at five levels:
A: chemistry similarity;
B: biological targets similarity;
C: networks similarity;
D: cell-based bioactivity similarity;
E: similarity based on clinical data.
Those 5 categories of CC bioactivity descriptors were calculated and then subjected to manifold projection using UMAP algorithm, to project all NPs on a 2-Dimensional space. The current NP was highlighted with a small circle in the 2-D map. Below figures: left-to-right, A-to-E.

A: chemistry similarity
B: biological targets similarity
C: networks similarity
D: cell-based bioactivity similarity
E: similarity based on clinical data