Natural Product: NPC197980

Natural Product IDNPC197980
Common Name
?
The InCHIKey will be temporarily assigned as the "Common Name" if no IUPAC name or alternative short name is available.
TYEFCPJCPSRVMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N
IUPAC Name n.a.
Synonyms
Synthetic Gene Cluster n.a.
ChEMBL Identifier n.a.
PubChem CID 46173975
Chemical Classification
  • CHEMONTID:0000000 [Organic compounds]
    • [CHEMONTID:0001392] Lignans, neolignans and related compounds
      • [CHEMONTID:0003686] Furanoid lignans
        • [CHEMONTID:0001604] Tetrahydrofuran lignans
          • [CHEMONTID:0003424] 9,9'-epoxylignans
            • [CHEMONTID:0001613] Dibenzylbutyrolactone lignans

The Chemical Classification was calculated by Classyfire, a software for chemical taxonomy calculation. Reference: DOI:10.1186/s13321-016-0174-y.

  Chemical Representations

Standard InCHIKey TYEFCPJCPSRVMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Standard InCHI InChI=1S/C42H46O12/c1-47-33-15-23(11-27-21-53-41(45)31(27)13-25-17-35(49-3)39(43)36(18-25)50-4)7-9-29(33)30-10-8-24(16-34(30)48-2)12-28-22-54-42(46)32(28)14-26-19-37(51-5)40(44)38(20-26)52-6/h7-10,15-20,27-28,31-32,43-44H,11-14,21-22H2,1-6H3
SMILES COc1cc(ccc1c1ccc(CC2COC(=O)C2Cc2cc(c(c(c2)OC)O)OC)cc1OC)CC1COC(=O)C1Cc1cc(c(c(c1)OC)O)OC

  Calculated Properties

Physi-Chem Properties

Molecular Weight:   742.3 Volume:   752.221
?
Van der Waals volume.
Dense:   0.987 LogP:   2.841
?
The logarithm of the n-octanol/water distribution coefficients.
logD7.4:   2.75
?
The logarithm of the n-octanol/water distribution coefficient at pH=7.4.
LogS:   -4.972
?
The logarithm of aqueous solubility value.
Rotatable Bonds:   15.0 Rigid Bonds:   36.0
TPSA:   148.44
?
Topological Polar Surface Area.
H-Bond Acceptor:   12.0
H-Bond Donor:   2.0 Rings:   6.0
Heavy Atoms:   12.0

MedChem Properties

QED Drug-Likeness Score:   0.138 GASA:   0.0
?
GASA represents the probability of being difficult to synthesize, ranging from 0 to 1.
Synthetic Accessibility Score:   4.245 Fsp3:   0.381
MCE-18:   121.862
?
MCE-18 stands for medicinal chemistry evolution.MCE-18≥45 is considered a suitable value.
Lipinski Rule-of-5:   Accepted
Pfizer Rule:   Rejected GSK Rule:   Accepted
Golden Triangle Rule:   Accepted BMS Rule:   0
Chelating Alert:   1 PAINS Alert:   0
Colloidal aggregators:   0.991 Fluc inhibitor:   0.095
?
The fluc inhibitor value is the probability of being fLuc inhibitors, within the range of 0 to 1.
Blue fluorescence:   0.016
?
The blue fluorescence value is the probability of being blue fluorescence, within the range of 0 to 1
Green fluorescence:   0.527
?
The green fluorescence value is the probability of being green fluorescence, within the range of 0 to 1
Reactive compounds:   0.236 Promiscuous compounds:   0.15

ADMET Properties (ADMETlab3.0)

ADMET: Absorption

Caco-2 Permeability:   -5.307 MDCK Permeability:   -4.832
Pgp-inhibitor:   0.916 Pgp-substrate:   0.005
PAMPA:   0.0
?
The experimental data for Peff was logarithmically transformed (logPeff). Molecules with log Peff values below 2.0 were classified as low-permeability (Category 0), while those with log Peff values exceeding 2.5 were classified as high-permeability (Category 1).
Human Intestinal Absorption (HIA):   0.0
20% Bioavailability (F20%):   0.0 30% Bioavailability (F30%):   0.0
50% Bioavailability (F50%):   0.008

ADMET: Distribution

Blood-Brain-Barrier Penetration (BBB):   0.0 MRP1:   1.0
Plasma Protein Binding (PPB):   99.427% Volume Distribution (VD):   -0.523
Fu: 0.377%
?
The fraction unbound in plasms.
OATP1B1 inhibitor:   1.0
OATP1B3 inhibitor:   0.944 BCRP inhibitor:   0.0
BSEP inhibitor:   1.0

ADMET: Metabolism

CYP1A2-inhibitor:   0.008 CYP1A2-substrate:   1.0
CYP2C19-inhibitor:   1.0 CYP2C19-substrate:   1.0
CYP2C9-inhibitor:   0.852 CYP2C9-substrate:   0.0
CYP2D6-inhibitor:   0.0 CYP2D6-substrate:   1.0
CYP3A4-inhibitor:   1.0 CYP3A4-substrate:   0.991
CYP2B6-substrate:   0.0 CYP2C8-inhibitor:   1.0
HLM stability:   0.993
?
Human liver microsomal (HLM) stability. Category 0: stable+ (HLM > 30 min); Category 1: unstable- (HLM ≤ 30 min). The output value is the probability of human liver microsomal instability, where a value closer to 1 indicates a higher likelihood of instability.

ADMET: Excretion

Clearance (CL):  2.986 Half-life (T1/2):  1.991

ADMET: Toxicity

hERG Blockers:  0.92 hERG Blockers (10um):  0.943
Human Hepatotoxicity (H-HT):  0.995 Drug-induced Liver Injury (DILI):  0.889
AMES Toxicity:  0.321 Rat Oral Acute Toxicity:  0.347
Maximum Recommended Daily Dose:  0.996 Skin Sensitization:  0.808
Carcinogencity:  0.815 Eye Corrosion:  0.0
Eye Irritation:  0.0 Respiratory Toxicity:  0.199
Drug-induced Neurotoxicity:  0.52 Ototoxicity:  0.999
Hematotoxicity:  0.887 Drug-induced Nephrotoxicity:  0.997
Genotoxicity:  0.961 RPMI-8226 Immunitoxicity:  0.516
A549 Cytotoxicity:  0.958 Hek293 Cytotoxicity:  0.984
BCF:   1.371
?
Bioconcentration factors are used for considering secondary poisoning potential and assessing risks to human health via the food chain. The unit is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)].
IGC50:   5.112
?
48 hour Tetrahymena pyriformis IGC50. The unit of IGC50 is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)].
LC50DM:   6.528
?
48 hour Daphnia magna LC50. The unit of LC50DM is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)].
LC50FM:   6.059
?
96 hour fathead minnow LC50. The unit of LC50FM is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)].

  Species Source

Organism ID Organism Name Taxonomy Level Family SuperKingdom Isolation Part Collection Location Collection Time Reference
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. DOI[10.1111/ppl.12252]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. root n.a. PMID[15894448]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. leaf n.a. PMID[15894448]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota aerial parts purchased in Juhuacun herbal market, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China 2002-Oct PMID[16562826]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. PMID[18357994]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. leaf n.a. PMID[21598983]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. leaf n.a. PMID[22026410]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. fruit n.a. PMID[22396124]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. PMID[23501116]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. PMID[8377022]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[COCONUT]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[COCONUT]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota Fruit n.a. n.a. Database[FooDB]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota Leaf n.a. n.a. Database[FooDB]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota Root n.a. n.a. Database[FooDB]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota Seed n.a. n.a. Database[FooDB]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. Database[FooDB]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[HerDing]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[HerDing]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. Database[Phenol-Explorer]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[TCMID]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[TCMID]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[TCM_Taiwan]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[TCM_Taiwan]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[TM-MC]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[TM-MC]
NPO3578 Andrographis paniculata Species Acanthaceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[UNPD]
NPO10449 Arctium lappa Species Asteraceae Eukaryota n.a. n.a. n.a. Database[UNPD]

Note for Reference:
In addition to directly collecting NP source organism data from primary literature (where reference will provided as NCBI PMID or DOI links), NPASS also integrated them from below databases:
UNPD: Universal Natural Products Database [PMID: 23638153].
StreptomeDB: a database of streptomycetes natural products [PMID: 33051671].
TM-MC: a database of medicinal materials and chemical compounds in Northeast Asian traditional medicine [PMID: 26156871].
TCM@Taiwan: a Traditional Chinese Medicine database [PMID: 21253603].
TCMID: a Traditional Chinese Medicine database [PMID: 29106634].
TCMSP: The traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology database and analysis platform [PMID: 24735618].
HerDing: a herb recommendation system to treat diseases using genes and chemicals [PMID: 26980517].
MetaboLights: a metabolomics database [PMID: 27010336].
FooDB: a database of constituents, chemistry and biology of food species [www.foodb.ca].



  NP Quantity Composition/Concentration

Organism ID Organism Name Organism Material Preparation Organism Part NP Quantity (Standard) NP Quantity (Minimum) NP Quantity (Maximum) Quantity Unit Reference

Note for Reference:
In addition to directly collecting NP quantitative data from primary literature (where reference will provided as NCBI PMID or DOI links), NPASS also integrated NP quantitative records for specific NP domains (e.g., NPS from foods or herbs) from domain-specific databases. These databases include:
DUKE: Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases.
PHENOL EXPLORER: is the first comprehensive database on polyphenol content in foods [PMID: 24103452], its homepage can be accessed at here.
FooDB: a database of constituents, chemistry and biology of food species [www.foodb.ca].



 Biological Activity

Molecular-level activity

Target ID Target Type Target Name Target Organism Activity Type Activity Relation Value Unit Reference

In vitro activity

Target ID Target Type Target Name Target Organism Activity Type Activity Relation Value Unit Reference

In vivo activity

Target ID Target Type Target Name Target Organism Activity Type Activity Relation Value Unit Reference





 Experimental ADME

Experiment Model Experiment Tissue ADME Type ADME Relation ADME Value ADME Unit Reference





 Experimental Toxicity

Quantitative toxicity

Experiment Model Experiment Organism Toxicity Type Toxicity Relation Toxicity Value Toxicity Unit Reference

Common Abbreviations:
LC: Lethal Concentration; LD: Lethal Dose; LT:Lethal Time; NOAEL: No-observed-adverse-effect Level; BMDL: Benchmark Dose Lower Confidence Limit; BMD: Benchmark Dose; BMC:Benchmark Concentration; LOAEL: Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level; RfD:Reference Dose; RfC:Reference Concentration; MRL: Minimal Risk Level; MEG: Maximum Exposure Guideline; PAC: Protective Action Criteria

Categorical toxicity labels

Hepatotoxicity Carcinogenicity Mutagenicity Cardiotoxicity Respiratory Toxicity Eye Irritation Endocrine Disruption
Hepatotoxicity Carcinogenicity Mutagenicity Cardiotoxicity Respiratory Toxicity Eye Irritation Endocrine Disruption

Note for Reference:
In addition to directly collecting NP quantitative data from primary literature (where reference will provided as NCBI PMID or DOI links), NPASS also integrated NP toxicity records from domain-specific databases. These databases include:
ToxValDB: a curated database that compiles quantitative toxicity values for chemicals from diverse public sources to support toxicological research and risk assessment.
TOXRIC: a comprehensive, free-to-access, online database providing toxicological/feature data. The toxicity labels are retrieved from this database. [PMID: 36400569]


  Chemically structural similarity

Similar Active Natural Products in NPASS

Top-200 similar NPs were calculated against the active-NP-set (includes approximately 50,000 NPs with experimentally-derived bioactivity available in NPASS)

Similarity is measured using the Tanimoto coefficient (Tc) , which compares the binary fingerprints of two molecules. Tc is calculated as the intersection divided by the union of '1' bits in the fingerprints, ranging from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating highest similarity.

●  The left chart: Distribution of similarity level between NPC197980 and all remaining natural products in the NPASS database.
●  The right table: Most similar natural products (Tc>=0.5 or Top200).

Similarity Score Similarity Level Natural Product ID
0.7321 Intermediate Similarity NPC273657
0.6721 Remote Similarity NPC145569
0.6607 Remote Similarity NPC68779
0.6607 Remote Similarity NPC108598
0.65 Remote Similarity NPC106920
0.65 Remote Similarity NPC15811
0.6393 Remote Similarity NPC293757
0.6393 Remote Similarity NPC668
0.597 Remote Similarity NPC478705
0.5968 Remote Similarity NPC300776
0.5968 Remote Similarity NPC176814
0.5968 Remote Similarity NPC4982
0.5968 Remote Similarity NPC606629
0.5926 Remote Similarity NPC72796
0.5862 Remote Similarity NPC211386
0.5714 Remote Similarity NPC223807
0.5714 Remote Similarity NPC5310
0.5672 Remote Similarity NPC216223
0.5522 Remote Similarity NPC282291
0.5522 Remote Similarity NPC166137
0.5429 Remote Similarity NPC478703
0.5429 Remote Similarity NPC478704
0.5397 Remote Similarity NPC176586
0.5397 Remote Similarity NPC210354
0.5246 Remote Similarity NPC40237
0.5217 Remote Similarity NPC174512
0.5082 Remote Similarity NPC92693
0.5079 Remote Similarity NPC205915
0.5077 Remote Similarity NPC191158
0.5077 Remote Similarity NPC177644

Similar Clinical/Approved Drugs

Similarity level is defined by Tanimoto coefficient (Tc) between two molecules.

●  The left chart: Distribution of similarity level between NPC197980 and all drugs/candidates.
●  The right table: Most similar clinical/approved drugs (Tc>=0.5 or Top200).

Similarity Score Similarity Level Drug ID Developmental Stage
NPD

Bioactivity similarity

  Bioactivity similarity

Similar Natural Products in NPASS

Similarity level is defined by Bioactivity similarity was calculated based on bioactivity descriptors of compounds. The bioactivity descriptors were calculated by a recently developed AI algorithm Chemical Checker (CC) [Nature Biotechnology, 38:1087–1096, 2020; Nature Communications, 12:3932, 2021], which evaluated bioactivity similarities at five levels:
A: chemistry similarity;
B: biological targets similarity;
C: networks similarity;
D: cell-based bioactivity similarity;
E: similarity based on clinical data.
Those 5 categories of CC bioactivity descriptors were calculated and then subjected to manifold projection using UMAP algorithm, to project all NPs on a 2-Dimensional space. The current NP was highlighted with a small circle in the 2-D map. Below figures: left-to-right, A-to-E.

A: chemistry similarity
B: biological targets similarity
C: networks similarity
D: cell-based bioactivity similarity
E: similarity based on clinical data